Archive for August, 2009

Aug
31

Ridiculous Claim of the Day

Posted by: Lonely Conservative | Comments (2)

From Jake Tapper:

Responding to criticism from former Vice President Cheney that President Obama is making the nation more vulnerable to terrorism, the president’s National Security Adviser, Gen. Jim Jones (Ret.), told ABC News in an exclusive interview that actually the reverse is true: President Obama’s greater success with international relations has meant more terrorists put out of commission.

Oh yeah, look how well things are going in Afghanistan. And what about the release of the Pan Am 103 bomber. I could go on, but it’s late and I don’t feel like it. This is just ridiculous.

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments (2)

I don’t know if Barack Obama and the rest of the democrats wonder why we’re angry or not. Maybe they know perfectly well why we’re angry and they simply don’t care. They have their radical agenda and they’re sticking to it. And sticking it to all of us. 

At least Americans are waking up and taking notice. And they don’t like what they’ve found out. Not one little bit. It isn’t just health care. It’s everything. The Wall Street Journal makes the point that it’s the expanding role of government that’s riled Americans.

At August’s town-hall meetings, voters often started with complaints about health care, only to shift to frustrations about all the other things President Barack Obama and the Democrats have done or tried to do since January. The $787 billion economic-stimulus package, the government-led rescue of General Motors Corp. and climate-change legislation all came in for criticism.

“I have seen a level of dissatisfaction and even anger that I haven’t experienced in the years that I’ve been a member of Congress,” Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican, told an audience at a health-care meeting in Kansas City on Monday.

Although the election is still far off, political forecasters predict that Democrats could run into trouble in the 2010 midterm vote.

“What we’re seeing now, both in terms of numbers and the feel out there, this is how big waves feel early on,” said Charlie Cook, editor of the Cook Political Report.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs dismissed any talk of political doom hanging over the president and his party.

Let’s hope this is a big wave. I have a feeling it is. Sure, former presidents have had their share of protesters, but those were usually fringe groups. Your average American doesn’t usually protest anything – maybe a grumble here and there to friends and family, or even a shouting match; but nothing like this.

Another reason Americans are so angry is the sense they’re being lied to. How many Americans voted for Obama only to feel they were somehow scammed? The biggest scam is the way he sells his big government agenda by scaring people into thinking we’re facing the next Great Depression.

Allan Meltzer argues in The Wall Street Journal that there was no chance we were going to see 25% unemployment like we did in the 1930’s.

The facts we face today are very different than the grim reality Americans confronted between 1929 and 1932. True, this recession is not over. But it would have to get improbably worse before it came close to the 42-month duration of the Great Depression, or the 25% unemployment rate in 1932. Then, the only safety net was the soup line.

The current recession is also much less severe than the 1937-38 Depression. A more accurate comparison is to the 1973-75 recession. Today’s recession is as deep and most likely won’t be much longer than the one we experienced some three decades ago. By pointing this out, I do not intend to minimize the damage that the economic crisis has had on individuals and businesses. But as policy makers make decisions in order to alleviate the recession, they are not helped when economists overstate its severity. [...]

So why do many opinion makers insist on inaccurate and frightening analogies that overstate the severity of present conditions? I believe there are several reasons.

First, there is a strong political motivation to make this recession out to be worse than it actually is. The Obama administration wanted to make it appear as though it saved us from an incipient disaster, so it overstated its achievements. The White House also wanted to foist its huge “stimulus” program on the country in order to redistribute income. That pleased many Democrats, but did very little to restore growth.

Many others repeated the administration’s hyperbolic claims. One reason is because there is genuine uncertainty about what has happened and what is likely to come. Short-term forecasts have major errors, and extrapolation of current data adds to misinformation. Then there are economists who would like to see government take a larger role in the economy. They’ve chosen to use the recession as a pretext for arguing for this change.

If there is another Great Depression, it will be the result of this administration and congress’s disastrous policies.

No wonder Americans are so angry. It will be interesting to see how many show up in Washington, DC on September 12. It may be more than any of us could have imagined.

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

I think Glenn Beck aired this on his show Friday night. I was listening in the car and couldn’t see it, so I can’t be sure. Either way, it’s an excellent video created by a teenager named Justin Holcomb.

Via Free Republic

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics, Tea Party, history
Comments (0)

I’ve been meaning to get to this for days.

The Tea Party Express left Sacramento, CA on Saturday and today stopped in Ely, NV.

Click here for the Tea Party Express schedule. Who knows, they may be coming to a town near you. The last stop will be in Washington, DC on September 12. Unfortunately, I can’t make it to DC and I can’t make it to Albany on the 10th. I’ll see if I can live stream video of the march on Washington.

Fox News’s Griff Jenkins is following the Tea Party Express – here’s his latest video from Nevada where he spoke to voters who aren’t very happy with Harry Reid.

Video below Read More→

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics, Tea Party
Comments (0)

This is a great quote from Rush Limbaugh, via Free Republic.

I see things very clear. Obama’s health care plan will be, one, written by a committee whose head says he doesn’t understand it — that would be John Conyers — his health care plan will be, two, passed by Congress that has not read it; number three, signed by a president who smokes; four, funded by a Treasury chief who didn’t pay his taxes; five, overseen by a Surgeon General who is obese; and, six, financed by a country that’s nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong with this?

How can any sane person trust this gang with their health care? Good grief!

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Health Care, Politics
Comments (0)

Glenn Beck exposes the radicals surrounding and working for President Obama. Anyone who isn’t a socialist or Marxist should be very concerned about this. This isn’t about party, this is about our republic and the radicals taking it over. Is this the change you were after, America?

Partial transcript below.

The most transparent White House in the history of the world still hasn’t answered the questions we asked last week. You know, tough questions like: “Why does the president have so many Marxists, socialists, radicals and self-proclaimed communists advising him?”

[...]

But here’s The One Thing: This isn’t an accident. Obama’s radical advisers are there for a reason: They’re fighting a revolution — just not the kind with the tri-cornered hats.

So don’t expect the White House to apologize for hiring self-avowed communist green jobs “czar” Van Jones. If they did, Van might take offense to that — considering he named his son after a militant Marxist guerilla. Besides, why would the White House waste their time on this when liberal bloggers are doing their best to defend Van’s good name and his Wikipedia page is suddenly and mysteriously being updated to call him a “champion of market-based solutions?”

You see, Van Jones can’t possibly be a communist. Take it from former colleague Eva Paterson, who is president of the Equal Justice Society. Paterson admits that yes, for a while there Van was running around spouting 1960s rhetoric and romanticizing revolutionary icons (who hasn’t?) But that was years ago, she said.

Well, I’m not a mathematician, but remember Van Jones’ own description of his conversion to communism?

“In jail I met all these young radical people of color — I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, ‘This is what I need to be a part of. I spent the next 10 years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary’…. I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th… by August, I was a communist.”

That was in 1992 — plus 10 years — that’s 2002 — way back in Bush’s first term. But Eva, apparently the lone free-market warrior at the Equal Justice Society says she advised Van to: “Rethink his tactics” and to “work for change in wiser ways.”

Note: Not denounce or rethink Communism — just change tactics.

Where’s the “come to Jefferson” moment in this change? He doesn’t have one. Here’s about the only transformation he’s ever talked about — from a 2005 interview: “I’m willing to forgo the cheap satisfaction of the radical pose for the deep satisfaction of radical ends.”

This guy is still a radical — just like Cass Sunstein and John Holdren and Carol Browner and Mark Lloyd.

Some might be uncomfortable calling these individuals “radical” or “revolutionary,” but I’m not.

The best thing to do is ask America, are you comfortable with their viewpoints? Like this one: On Friday, Drudge had the story of the 55-page bill proposed by Senator Jay Rockefeller (S.773) that would allow the president to seize temporary control of private sector networks during a “cyber-security emergency.”

The bill also proposed a “federal certification program” for “cyber-security professionals,” certain computer systems and networks in the private sector would have to be operated by those with that license. And private networks deemed “critical” by the government “shall share” requested information with the federal government.

Ten years ago, I might have been stupid enough to go for this, but not after I watched the Bush administration grab far too much power. And now this administration trying to take control over seemingly everything. We already know how the president’s chief of staff feels about “taking advantage of a crisis.” Click here for full transcript.

Popularity: 3% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics, Socialism
Comments (0)

I thought the war on terror was over. And as far as that under-resourced war – why hasn’t Obama bothered to read the assessment?

Via Breitbart

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics, terrorism
Comments (1)

This is just so annoying. The media in this country spins the news as much or more than politicians. They ought to be ashamed.

Ed Morrissey compares coverage today to that of Bush’s “jobless recovery” in 2004. Then it was all doom and gloom, you know, because unemployment was down to 5.4%. Yet today, with unemployment at 9.5% everything’s rosy.

How embarrassing!

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Economy, Media bias, Politics
Comments (1)

Rep. Diane Watson can’t praise Castro and the Cuban health system enough. What an idiot! Not only is she a commie lover, she’s also a race baiter as documented by Michelle Malkin.

And lemme tell ya, before you say “Oh, it’s a commu–”, you need to go down there and see what Fidel Castro put in place. And I want you to know, now, you can think whatever you want to about Fidel Castro, but he was one of the brightest leaders I have ever met. [APPLAUSE]

And you know, the Cuban revolution that kicked out the wealthy, Che Guevara did that, and then, after they took over, they went out among the population to find someone who could lead this new nation, and they found…well, just leave it there (laughs), an attorney by the name of Fidel Castro…

Yeah, things are sooo much better in Cuba than they are here in the US. That’s why we’re constantly seeing Americans swimming to Cuba.

Popularity: 3% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics, Socialism
Comments (4)

Joe Scarborough raises some good questions about Obama’s role in Scotland’s decision to release the Pan Am 103 bomber, such as what did he know and when did he know it. Even if someone asks, I’m sure we won’t hear the truth coming out of the White House.

H/T Newsbusters

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

The only thing fun about having Obama as president is watching his poll numbers drop like a stone. The trend continues, he’s now at another new low. His approval index is at -13 according to Rassmussen Reports.

Overall, 46% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance. That’s the lowest level of total approval yet measured for Obama. Fifty-three percent (53%) now disapprove. Eighty-one percent (81%) of Democrats approve while 83% of Republicans disapprove. As for those not affiliated with either major party, 66% disapprove. See other recent demographic highlights from the tracking polls.

Congress isn’t doing much better. 57% of Americans want to throw all of the bums out.

So it makes sense that republican challengers are holding their own town hall meetings, and drawing pretty big crowds for people who aren’t even in office. Americans finally see the Marxist writing on the wall. It’s a crying shame they didn’t see it last November.

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics
Comments (0)

Another video flashback from Naked Emperor News.

President Obama said in 2006 that combining public and private insurance would be the “worst of both worlds.”

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Health Care, Politics
Comments (0)

In 2006 Obama criticized President Bush for not reining in his surrogates. He may want to take his own advice. But today he’s just as bad as his surrogates. What a hypocrite.

Popularity: 1% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics
Comments (0)

Any skeptics of the Obama administration have to be asking themselves the above question. I know I have. To reasonable people it makes no sense at all. Why on earth did Eric Holder and Obama’s Department of Justice decide to drop the charges against Black Panthers weilding knight sticks at a polling place? Why did the DOJ drop charges against Bill Richardson?

What is Holder – and by extension his boss Obama - interested in? It’s really disturbing, at least if you hear what Andrew McCarthy has to say. He spoke to Mike Church on Friday (I heard the re-run on Sunday) about the way the left and Obama believe that we should be subject to some sort of world body when it comes to the rule of law. With this gang, so much for national sovereignty.

Dick Cheney (the one they most likely want to go after) had this to say about the decision to go after the CIA:

What do you think of that decision? 

CHENEY: I think it’s a terrible decision. President Obama made the announcement some weeks ago that this would not happen, that his administration would not go back and look at or try to prosecute CIA personnel. And the effort now is based upon the inspector general’s report that was sent to the Justice Department five years ago, was completely reviewed by the Justice Department in years past. 

They made decisions about whether or not there was any prosecutable offense there. They found one. It did not involve CIA personnel, it involved contract personnel. That individual was sentenced and is doing time. The matter’s been dealt with the way you would expect it to be dealt with by professionals. 

Now we’ve got a political appointee coming back, and supposedly without the approval of the president, going to do a complete review, or another complete investigation, possible prosecution of CIA personnel. We could talk the whole program about the negative consequences of that, about the terrible precedent it sets, to have agents involved, CIA personnel involved, in a difficult program that’s approved by the Justice Department, approved by the National Security Council, and the Bush administration, and then when a new administration comes in, it becomes political. 

They may find themselves dragged up before a grand jury, have to hire attorneys on their own because the Justice Department won’t provide them with counsel. 

It’s a terrible, terrible precedent.

Read the full transcript here.

It sure is a terrible precedent. One I’m sure the Obama administration will use to their advantage every chance they get. Lucky for them most major newspapers bury terrorism stories, and those two wars we’re still fighting, deep within the pages of their publications.

It’s too bad the press is no longer completely paying attention to, or heck, even covering events. (I wonder why – Did Obama give them a big summer bonus?)

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments (4)

I suppose in Obama’s “democracy” only certain people are allowed to ask questions or hold signs.

This one I found on HotAir – A man had the nerve to ask a question of New Hampshire Rep. Carol Shea-Porter and was removed by the police. Be sure to follow the link for more information, like the fact that the gentleman removed from the meeting is a retired police officer.

This next video is a man holding a poster sporting an unflattering picture of Obama that a cop didn’t like so the cop threatened the man with arrest. (H/T AWM)

I wish I could say that’s all I found in the few short hours since coming home from a weekend away – all the while cleaning the kids’ play room, doing two loads of laundry and unpacking! But of course, in this lovely new hope and change democracy of ours these sorts of things are routine. And, has anybody noticed how nobody mentions the word ”republic” anymore? But I digress, here’s video I found at Gateway Pundit of a union thug elbowing someone who disgrees with him in the face. Be sure to pay attention from the moment the video begins.

This is some change we have going on here. When Bush was president I remember protester thugs going after cops. Now that Obama’s president we have union goons and democrat congressmen going after normal Americans. I don’t feel a tingle in my leg, but I do feel a chill up my spine.

I leave you with this video. Gathering of Eagles posted it, showing how NY Rep. Tim Bishop bussed in union thugs in an effort to pack his town hall meeting with supporters. Thankfully there were enough sane people present to drown them out. Again, be sure to follow the link for more information. I just have to wonder how much longer we will be able to protest the statists.

I’m just wondering, does any of this sound familiar?

Popularity: 2% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Politics, Socialism, crime
Comments (2)

Subscribe

Subscribe to The Lonely Conservative

Get the latest updates delivered via email