Creepy – Justice Ginsburg thought Roe was to rid us of undesirables
By
I thought I read this wrong – her first thought on Roe v. Wade was eugenics?!? Then I thought “It is Ruth Bader Ginsberg.”
It’s still creepy. Via Free Republic, WND reports on an astonishing admission by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
Her remarks, set to be published in the New York Times Magazine this Sunday but viewable online now, came in an in-depth interview with Emily Bazelon titled, “The Place of Women on the Court.” [...]
Question: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?
Ginsburg: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae - in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.
Justice Ginsburg inadvertently revealed the way leftists in America think.
Popularity: 4% [?]
