8 Responses

1. andrew brown Said,

   I watched the show last night — I don’t, normally, but my wife does, and thought it was great. But reading the actual dialogue just now makes me realize how great it really was. Notice that the bloggers being mentioned are not just conservatives — they’re bloggers in general. And take special notice of the fact that conservatives aren’t called stupid. It’s stupid people who are called stupid — people who don’t have good reasons for doing what they do.

   Posted on November 18th, 2008 at 10:51 pm

2. Lonely Conservative Said,

   Too late for a debate tonight. The little one’s not feeling well so it could be a long night. Take care.

   Posted on November 18th, 2008 at 11:10 pm

3. laura Said,

   Well, i might only be an entry level of life form but at least i have enough brains to NOT vote for someone who very well may not even be a US native born citizen.

   Know what i mean?

   Yeah…

   Posted on November 19th, 2008 at 10:12 am

4. ZORRO Said,

   Thanks again, Andrew, for your predictably insipid input into the discourse. Next, you’ll be telling us why the “Fairness Doctrine” is a good idea, and why non-secret votes for unions is great for the country. I saw “Boston Legal” once several years ago. It was terrible, but I can see why people like Andrew would enjoy it. Just another voice of the Democrat Party.

   Posted on November 19th, 2008 at 1:01 pm

5. andrew brown Said,

   Don’t thank me, Zero, thank your poor reading comprehension skills for keeping you at the bottom of the class. The pathetically named Fairness Doctrine was one of those pointless attempts to give a voice to people and/or groups who are too slow-witted and inarticulate to HAVE a voice. Fortunately, Zero, you seem to know that you’re too dense to get much advantage from a FD.

   And here’s why. You THINK you read my comment, but you missed the main point which is that I DON’T watch the show. And you go on to say that, though you hated the one show you watched, you can see why people “like Andrew” would like it.

   Why is that, Zero? Any details? Any examples? Your type never goes in for details. You’re like kids who scream an insult and run like hell. Just don’t forget to run, Zero. You’re the emptiest dolt on this blog, and even though your comments are tiny, you still can’t seem to put a pissant’s worth of sense into them.

   So, since you won’t be able to make any sensible reply to what I’ve written so far, why don’t you try explaining why you think I should give a damn about union votes. I carried a Steelworkers card for three years, but that was a long time ago — back when union members were solid men and great women, and not a bunch of belly-up carp in a sludge tank. I’m glad I got out before they became what they are: a big lunch room full of old ladies of both sexes, all whining about break time.

   Another voice for the Democrats? You won’t hear any democrats talk the way I do about unions. You just can’t seem to get a damn thing right, Zero. Now come back at me, Zero. You like calling people out? Try it again. Call me insipid.

   Posted on November 20th, 2008 at 10:04 pm

6. Lonely Conservative Said,

   Andrew, you may want to tone it down a bit. In defense of Zorro, you said you watched that particular show, and then after reading the dialogue you thought it was great. While it is true that most Americans have no idea who they just voted for, the dialogue seemed to miss that point. My reading of it was that only the McCain voters were the uninformed. Check out the video “How Obama Got Elected” to see which side the uninformed are on.

   Posted on November 20th, 2008 at 10:54 pm

7. Lonely Conservative Said,

   Andrew, there is something else I’ve noticed about you. Without taking the time to pour through all of the past comments, it’s my recollection that you bill yourself as someone with great compassion. Yet when Allen wrote a heartfelt piece about his feelings on Veteran’s Day you took it as an invitation to bash conservatives. Your comments showed you really don’t have any idea about most conservatives’ values. Even in this post, I mentioned that I wasn’t going to debate you because my child was ill. Rather than inquire as to the health of my child, you were more interested in attacking Zorro. And don’t blame this on him, he sent me an email asking if everything was ok. You sir, did no such thing. So much for compassion for the littlest among us. Or is it above your pay grade to decide who among us deserves compassion, or for that matter, to live? Are you more interested in the health of the collective than the health of one little boy?

   Posted on November 20th, 2008 at 11:25 pm

8. andrew brown Said,

   Lonely,
   You’re taking an awful lot of long breaks from watching your sick child. Do you really think that fooling with this blog is more important caring for a child? Wherever you thought you saw me “bill myself” as compassionate, you couldn’t have been more wrong. Sorry to disappoint, but I like fighting. That’s what I’m here for.

   I did notice that you mentioned your child, and I considered it slightly presumptuous. This is an ADULT venue. Can no place free from these noisy urchins? This is where adults talk LIKE adults to other adults about important matters. Any one who has to care for their child and cannot do it in a quiet fashion should send the kid away.child absent. I know that if the world were dumbed down to nursury level, it would help a lot of them

   Tell you what, why don’t you vote on it. When the results come in you can swing them to show that all non-con voters are terrible people. Presto

   Posted on November 21st, 2008 at 1:39 am

Add A Comment